Difference between revisions of "Unit tests for SanXoT"

From PROTEOMICA
Jump to: navigation, search
(Unit test for Unix/Linux operating systems)
(Unit test for Unix/Linux operating systems)
 
Line 29: Line 29:
 
# Use the source code from GitHub ('''[https://github.com/CNIC-Proteomics/SanXoT https://github.com/CNIC-Proteomics/SanXoT]'''), rather than the standalone exes provided below.
 
# Use the source code from GitHub ('''[https://github.com/CNIC-Proteomics/SanXoT https://github.com/CNIC-Proteomics/SanXoT]'''), rather than the standalone exes provided below.
  
This can be done by using the following pip commands:
+
Step #2 can be done by using the following pip commands:
  
 
  pip install numpy
 
  pip install numpy

Latest revision as of 16:42, 17 August 2018

We present here three unit tests for windows that can be performed using the following programs in the SanXoT software package:

For detailed explanations, check: exploring SanXoT features.

Unit test for Windows

Links to SanXoT windows standalone executables are provided in this unit test. Additionally, download links to the source code and up-to-date versions of SanXoT are available at: SanXoT software package.

To facilitate the user experience, the Windows executables are ready to be used with no need to install anything (not even Python!).

Unit test for Unix/Linux operating systems

Although SanXoT has been mainly tested and used in Windows, SanXoT has been developed in Python. As a multi-platform language, these unit tests can be performed also in Unix/Linux operating systems. To do so, you just need to:

  1. Install Python 2.7.x,
  2. Install NumPy and SciPy,
  3. Install Graphviz (used for interpreting the file *.gv in DOT language generating the Sanson clustering graphs in Test 3),
  4. Replace the *.bat files within the unit tests by the files contained here: File:SanXoT commands for Unix shell.zip.
  5. Use the source code from GitHub (https://github.com/CNIC-Proteomics/SanXoT), rather than the standalone exes provided below.

Step #2 can be done by using the following pip commands:

pip install numpy
pip install matplotlib
pip install scipy

Test 1: The fundamental workflow

The fundamental workflow consists of the steps to quantify proteins using PSMs and quantitative information, based on the WSPP (Weighted Spectrum, Peptide and Protein) statistical model, as described[1]., using the following the steps:

  • calibration of spectra
  • integrating from spectra to peptides
  • integrating from peptides to proteins
  • quantifying proteins

This test makes use of four programs: Aljamia, Klibrate, SanXoT, and SanXoTSieve.

To run this unit test, follow these steps:

1) download the windows executables, SanXoT.zip. Unzip the whole content in a folder specific for the program.

2) download the files for the unit test, SanXoT_test1.zip. Unzip to a working folder. You should have two folders, one with the input for this test, and another with the expected results. In the former, you will find two text files:

  • commands_test1.bat, a windows batch file with command lines to run this sample analysis.
  • 170415_Marga_GBS_iTRAQ_PSMs.txt, a tab-separated-values text file with identifications and quantitative data from a proteomics experiment[2].

3) get a) the path of your working folder (where you have unzipped the file 170415_Marga_GBS_iTRAQ_PSMs.txt), b) the path of the folder where you have unzipped the windows executables, and c) the unit of the latter (C:, D:, etc); modify the following lines in the command_test1.bat file accordingly:

set unit=D:
set programFolder="D:\SSP"
set workingFolder="D:\SanXoT_test1"

4) execute the commands_test1.bat file, copy and paste (or drag and drop) the whole commands_test1.bat text into a command prompt window (you can also just double click the bat file; however, if an error arises, the CMD window created will close immediately, so the text of the error will not be available).

5) wait until it finishes. It should take 30-60 seconds (for a regular PC with 64-bit Windows 10, 3.4 GHz, 32 GB RAM).

6) compare your results with the data in folder SanXoT_test1_results, at SanXoT_test1.zip (for example using a comparison software such as Beyond Compare). Only the files ending in *_log.txt and *_infoFile.txt should have differences (and only due to the different path for files, and the timestamp, all other features being identical, such as variances, Levenberg-Marquardt steps, and options).

Test 2: Experiment merging

Protein quantifications from different technical or biological replicates can be merged into experiment-independent quantifications, giving the biological and technical variance. In this test we

  • use the resulting data from Test 1
  • perform the fundamental workflow for another parallel experiment
  • we merge both experiments

This test makes use of four programs: Klibrate, SanXoT, SanXoTSieve, and Cardenio.

To run this unit test, follow these steps:

1) use the windows executables unzipped in step 1 of Test 1 (SanXoT.zip).

2) download the files for the unit test, SanXoT_test2.zip. This contains:

  • all the files generated in Test 1
  • the tagFile.txt (for Cardenio)
  • the commands_test2.bat.

3) remember to change the following lines in the command_test2.bat file, as in step 3 for Test 1:

set unit=D:
set programFolder="D:\SSP"
set workingFolder="D:\SanXoT_test2"

4) execute the commands_test2.bat file (do the same as in step 4 in Test 1).

5) wait until it finishes. As in Test 1, this test should take 30-60 seconds (for a regular PC with 64-bit Windows 10, 3.4 GHz, 32 GB RAM).

6) as in Test 1, the only files that are not identical should be the merge_logFile.txt from Cardenio, and the *_infoFile.txt from SanXoT, SanXoTSieve and Klibrate.

Test 3: Systems biology

The SanXoT Sowftware Package can be used to perform systems biology analises using the SBT (Systems Biology Triangle) as described.[3] In this test we:

  • generate a relations file using data from the DAVID bioinformatics resource (you can download yourself the data from them, but for your convenience we already included it)
  • use the resulting data from Test 2
  • calculate a category-level fold-change
  • make the analysis of the systems biology.

This test makes use of seven programs: Camacho, SanXoT, SanXoTSieve, SanXoTSqueezer, Sanson, SanXoTGauss, and Coordinometer.

To run this test, follow these steps:

1) use the windows executables unzipped in step 1 of Test 1 (SanXoT.zip).

2) download the files for the unit test, SanXoT_test3.zip. This contains:

  • all the files generated in Test 1 and Test 2
  • the tab-separated text file SB_Homo_19dic-2017.txt (a set of data downloaded from DAVID)
  • the commands_test3.bat.

3) remember to change the following lines in the command_test3.bat file, as in step 3 for Test 1 and Test 2:

set unit=D:
set programFolder="D:\SSP"
set workingFolder="D:\SanXoT_test3"

Additionally, if you want to get the similarity graph the category clustering algorithm (Sanson), you will need:

  • to have installed Graphviz (an open source external software, which includes the interpreter for the [1] DOT language, used by Sanson to generate the graphs for the clusters)
  • from the program folder, modify the dot.ini file changing the following line to include the path to the bin-folder of Graphviz, which could be different for each user:
dotlocation = C:\Program Files (x86)\Graphviz2.36\bin

4) execute the commands_test3.bat file (do the same as in step 4 in Test 1).

5) wait until it finishes. This test should take 10-20 seconds (for a regular PC with 64-bit Windows 10, 3.4 GHz, 32 GB RAM).

6) as in Test 1 and Test 2, the only files that are not identical should be the *_logFile.txt from Camacho, SanXoTSqueezer, Sanson, SanXoTGauss and the Coordinometer, as well as the *_infoFile.txt from SanXoT and SanXoTSieve. Additionally, if you use different versions of Graphviz (this test used Graphviz 2.36) you might find differences in the file sanson_simGraph.pdf (which is a pdf containing the final graph with the category clusters).

References

  1. Navarro, P., Trevisan-Herraz, M., Bonzon-Kulichenko, E., Núñez, E., Martínez-Acedo, P., Pérez-Hernández, D., Jorge, I., Mesa, R., Calvo, E., Carrascal, M., Hernáez, M.L., García, F., Bárcena, J.A., Ashman, K., Abian, J., Gil, C., Redondo, J.M. and Vázquez, J. (2014) General statistical framework for quantitative proteomics by stable isotope labeling. Journal of proteome research, 13, 1234-1247.
  2. Mateos-Hernández, L., et al. (2016) Quantitative proteomics reveals Piccolo as a candidate serological correlate of recovery from Guillain-Barré syndrome. Oncotarget, 7(46): 74582–74591.
  3. García-Marqués, F., Trevisan-Herraz, M., Martínez-Martínez, S., Camafeita, E., Jorge, I., Lopez, J.A., Méndez-Barbero, N., Méndez-Ferrer, S., del Pozo, M.A., Ibáñez, B., Andrés, V., Sánchez-Madrid, F., Redondo, J.M., Bonzon-Kulichenko, E. and Vázquez, J. (2016) A novel systems-biology algorithm for the analysis of coordinated protein responses using quantitative proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 15(5):1740-60.